For such a little unit, it’s actually got a good amount of versatility and options. The MOTU 828 MK2 is a 14 x 10 audio and MIDI interface designed for the home studio DAW that will support up to 96 kHz. In 2003, motu followed this up with a mkii version, offering better metering, support for high sample rates and additional. The latest version of motus 828 interface is a hybrid thunderbolt/usb 2.0 interface that offers a lot of features in a 1 rack unit size chassis at an excellent price point. Motu 828 Mk2, Audio en Mercado Libre Argentina.
It’s powered by either your computer via bus power, or with a nine volt power supply. There’s also a ¼” jack for a headphone input and metering is done with the LED screen on the front panel. It also has a MIDI input and output and the same for S/PDIF as well. As far as other connections go, it has six other ¼” inputs, eight ¼” outputs to correspond with each of the inputs, and ¼” main stereo outputs for sending your sound to your monitors. There are two microphone preamps, each of which have dual ¼”/XLR jacks and trim knobs, built in phantom power, and a pad for each as well.
Of course if this is your first audio interface, you might want to have the manual around to help you understand all of the basic components here.MOTU 16A Full Specifications: Sound Type: Stereo, Other connectors: Digital optical input (S/PDIF), Digital optical output (S/PDIF), We and our partners use cookies to give you the best online experience, including to personalise advertising and content.The Ins & Outs. Everything is pretty straight forward and direct once you understand all of the connections and features here. As long as you understand the characteristics and features involved here, you’re going to be able to operate the 828 MK2 without any issues. The appealing part of MOTU gear for a lot of people is the fact that jacks are. Comes with FireWire 400 to 80 cable Tried and true audio/MIDI interface with 8 inputs (2 of them are combo jacks) and 8 outputs. Some light surface scuffs from being in a rack.
Especially considering that this is meant for portability, the sound is quite sparkling clean. Source: 2 Oktava 012(CARD) > MOTU 828 > Powerbook > The 828 MK2 is overall a very clean sounding unit, from the preamps to the overall playback quality through the converters. Source: (On Stage) Crown SASS P-MK2 PZM + (FOH) Crown CM-700MPs > Shure FP42 > Sound Devices.
This one is the later in my opinion. In my travels I sometimes use great gear and sometimes not so great gear. MOTU has some great audio interfaces in all different price ranges and for different purposes, so if the 828 MK2 doesn’t do it for you, definitely check out the others that they have to offer.I travel sometimes and help out friends with studio projects. I don’t own this audio interface myself, but a friend of mine has it for his home studio and uses it all the time for recording on the go, which is really a great thing to be able to do. It will definitely work in your home studio if you want a little audio interface to run your DAW on, but I think it would work best as a supplemental unit for recording on the go.
Motu 828 Mk2 Drivers Were Up
Everything booted up properly and his drivers were up to date so it was all good. We never did more than 6 tracks during our session but he did say he would run more when sequencing/recording his synthesizers and that it handled the load just fine.There were no compatibility issues that I experienced. We used Pro Tools for the entire session and everything seemed to run smooth with the occasional CPU spike from CPU hungry mixing plugins. The latency was OK but was only noticed during mixing as we properly setup his gear to handle the latency during recording. Occasionally his PC would get overloaded in mixing but that was because of the heavy use of Plugins and his computer was a little behind. We never had any serious crashes or glitches.
With the dsp mixer and the front face of the unit itself, most of all the typical functions are found very easily. I have been using Totalmix with my RME Fireface 800 for awhile and I found them to be similar. The dsp Mixer that comes with unit makes controlling your ins and outs very easy. The unit is fairly easy to use.
The reality is you get what you pay for. I have worked with some MK3's briefly and find they don't suffer nearly as bad ad the MK2 does with this dullness.I don't know what he paid for the MK2, and maybe it was considered good quality back in the day, but I don't recommend it to anyone who wants a competitive quality of sound. The Fireface had much better dynamics and clarity and in my opinion, put the MK2 to shame. I think we did a decent job, but as soon as I was home, I compared our Raw tracks with some raw tracks I recorded with my FireFace and the difference was very noticeable. We spent a lot of time with EQ, Compression and various other effects trying to bring life back into them. What I didn't like was how, in my opinion, the recorded tracks were pretty dull, especially the drums.
I can use the CueMix FX to monitor artists using EQ, Comps, & Reverbs with no latency while having my DAW have a 1024 buffer and making it super solid and reliable. CueMix FX is great and anyone not using it is not using this thing to it's fullest. The 828 mk3 has not proven to be stable until I drop it 96 samples per buffer.Motu Hybred 828 mk3 Audio interface will take some getting use to.Why the special 9 pin to a 6 pin fire wire cable, when it would have been better and more convenient with a standardThe cable works fine when positioned in a certain way to fit.Although many computers are discontinuing firewire, for audio fire wire has more bandwidth.When the 828 Hybred mk3 works it' sounds pretty good.It replaces my Emu 1818M that I loved and had for many years.It took some time for Motu to release new drivers for this unit, once downloaded it works fine.Customer service at Motu was fine, I was able to speak with a tech who helped on the configurationBefore the latest driver release drivers for Windows on (version 7) from Motu Download sight.Getting started for me was a tough task, but after some reading of the manual (which is easy to understand) i got the hang of it fast.Overall, Very solid piece for an awesome price. My only real disappointment is the lowest latency setting of 64 samples per buffer this setting is not quite fast enough for a pro musician I normally run at 16 and if I want to run big multichannel shows I might drop to 32 samples per buffer.
Motu 828 Mk2 Software Can Control
I have mine hooked up via USB to W7 32bit w/ Samplitude 11.2 and it's been perfect. The software can control everything and you never really need to touch those though. On the BAD side.the LED's on the front are useless and the knobs on the front feel really sketchy. Just really, really feature loaded. Front two inputs are very handy and DO NOT overide analog 1 & 2 on the back.
CueMix has saved me $80.The learning curve is next to nothing. So you can have a 'Studio' for a headphone mix and another for Monitoring, then just load a 'Live' preset for when you go gigging. With the 828mkII, you get a free mixer practically! There are 4 mix channels and slots to save mixing presets. I like to purchase equipment based on whether the equipment can be used for production and live. GREAT piece at a great price.Nothing missing, in fact, it has extra that comes in very handy.
Recording at 96kHz/24-bit has great improved the overall sound of any recording. But who'd want to beat a $750 piece of gear with lights in it? You got your wife for that! :P I've only had it for almost a month and I take extra care of any gear, if an accident were to happen, I'm sure as hell confident it'll survive.The sound quality is prestine. If you're running your sequencer using the ASIO drivers, you can still run, say, Winamp thru the MME drivers.Just looking at the construction of the thing tells you it can take a beating. It comes with ASIO and MME drivers and you can run both concurrently. Given the limited size of the LCD on the 828mkII, it's a bit hard figuring where things are at first, but using the PC interface, you'll get a good idea and won't find it tough the next time you use the LCD.
Which is twice more samples/sec. But 96kHz is beyond practical, and if your machine can't handle this, there's 88.2kHz. All plugs are gold-plated, reducing any possibly of radio/noise interference (of course, hi-quality TRS/XLR cables to help A LOT!) If you're a perfectionist, 96kHz won't be enough(386kHz!). 24-bit allows for more digital processing without any noticeable degradation/data loss.
0 kommentar(er)
